share_log

华创证券:啤酒高端化行至中局 盈利改善明确

Huachuang Securities: High-end beer market to central office profit improvement is clear

Zhitong Finance ·  Feb 29 11:06

Currently, excessive market concerns about high-end have led to a decline in valuations, but in reality, the high-end approach is more than halfway, which is the core driver of the medium- to long-term profit growth of leading companies.

The Zhitong Finance App learned that Huachuang Securities released a research report saying that the current market's excessive concerns about high-end have led to a decline in valuations, but in reality, high-end marketing is more than halfway, which is the core driver for leading companies to increase their medium- to long-term profits. Looking at a 24-year period, profit forecasts are highly reliable, driven by cost dividends. Currently, from a PE perspective, Huarun and Tsing Beer 24E are about 15 and 20 times, respectively. At the same time, the beer company's cash flow is stable, and the bottom of the valuation reaffirms the recommendation. China Resources Beer (00291) and Tsingtao Brewery (600600.SH, 00168) are the first to be promoted, and Yanjing Brewery (000729.SZ), which continues to advance reforms, and focus on Chongqing Brewery (600132.SH) and Budweiser Asia Pacific (01876).

The views of Huacheng Securities are as follows:

International comparison: Japan cannot simply be compared. Looking at common overseas experience, China still has room for upgrading.

Some investors look at beer on the assumption that long-term deflation is in the background, and target China with the Japanese beer industry after the 90s. However, in reality, Japan is an extreme situation of long-term deflation (market depth is insufficient) and industrial policy (alcohol tax influence) suppression. Chinese and Japanese beer cannot be easily compared; moreover, although the price performance of Japanese beer is weak, the share of the high-end has increased under extreme pressure, which is a highlight. Looking at overseas from a broader perspective, we found that in most countries, high-end beers account for the mainstream of sales, while China currently accounts for a relatively high proportion of low-grade beer, and there is still plenty of room for upgrading. Compared to other domestic consumer industries, we believe that under the big wave of inflation in Chinese consumer goods in the past 20 years, beer has not kept up with the pace of upgrading. It has only accelerated in the past 5-6 years, and there is still a clear “latecomer advantage.”

High-end second half: Shifting gears without changing gears. 8-10 yuan instead of 6 yuan is more definitive. Although 10 yuan or more is more difficult, there are fewer players.

The sales structure of the industry has been upgraded from a “big bottom spire” to a “pyramid” in 19-23. Looking ahead to the next 5 years, we estimate that the total volume of the beer industry will be basically stable, and the structure will further shift to a “balanced” type. In terms of direction, high-end technology has entered the second stage, and the growth rate of industry upgrades has changed gears, but the direction has not changed. On the path: 1) The core is still continuous expansion of 8 yuan or more, and replacing the 6 yuan price band with 8-10 yuan is a high-end and highly deterministic logic. The successful direct price increase of Qingdao's classic 2 million ton single product and the continued release of U8 indicate that this price is full of vitality. 2) Over 10 yuan: More emphasis is placed on long-term brand development. Although it is more difficult, there are fewer players. Heineken under China Resources is growing rapidly, Budweiser is steady and has many highlights, and the rest of the brands are underperforming.

Interpretation of the pattern: Misplaced competition, clear hierarchy, Budweiser cultivates high-end, China Resources uses Heineken to occupy the high-end, and Tsing Beer Yanjing enjoys second-tier expansion dividends.

According to estimates, there are about 900,000 tons of ultra-high-grade (15 yuan or more). Budweiser has accumulated a deep accumulation. Currently, the ultra-high-grade market share exceeds 50%, and it has a high level of strategic importance. High-end (10-15 yuan) is about 5.2 million tons. Currently, Budweiser's share is about 36%. China Resources uses Heineken to take the lead and drive pure growth. Currently, its market share has rapidly increased to about 31%, and the strongest potential is expected to catch up with Budweiser. The second-high-end (8-10 yuan) is about 6 million tons. The price increase for classic Tsing Beer was complemented by the expansion dividend in 1903. At the time, Yanjing had the highest market share of 30%; China Resources had a market share of 17%, and China Resources had a market share of 14%. Super X plans to renew products and shift from individualization to popularization in the past, starting with Lao Yong breaking into the market with sales volume of nearly 3 million tons.

24-year outlook: Operations are expected to gradually pick up, and cost dividends will be released.

Benefiting from fine weather and the recovery of restaurants, many places reported that sales slightly exceeded expectations during the Spring Festival in '23 and that the structural performance was good. Although Q1 sales may still be under pressure from a high base, it is recommended to continue to pay attention to the post-holiday recovery. Once the recovery in demand strengthens, the low base during the peak season is expected to be catalyzed by highly elastic growth. On the cost side, barley costs are expected to drop by about 10%, and the pressure on packaging materials is expected to be low. Using Tsing Beer as an example, it is estimated that the gross margin is expected to increase by around 2 pcts, amplifying the 24-year performance increase. Furthermore, some investors are concerned that the pattern will deteriorate due to the increase in low-tier fee investment by leading companies. The current profit orientation is already an industry consensus, and the research feedback is only a tactical adjustment, so there is no need to worry about the increase in overall competition brought about by the increase in low-tier fee investment.

Risk warning: Consumption power continues to weaken, high-end sales fall short of expectations, competition intensifies, cost reduction falls short of expectations, estimates involve many assumptions, and there may be errors.

The translation is provided by third-party software.


The above content is for informational or educational purposes only and does not constitute any investment advice related to Futu. Although we strive to ensure the truthfulness, accuracy, and originality of all such content, we cannot guarantee it.
    Write a comment