share_log

Huangshan Tourism Development Co.,Ltd.'s (SHSE:600054) Stock Price Dropped 6.6% Last Week; Retail Investors Would Not Be Happy

Huangshan Tourism Development Co.,Ltd.'s (SHSE:600054) Stock Price Dropped 6.6% Last Week; Retail Investors Would Not Be Happy

黃山旅遊開發有限公司, Ltd. 's(SHSE: 600054)上週股價下跌6.6%;散戶投資者不會高興
Simply Wall St ·  02/01 15:01

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significant control over Huangshan Tourism DevelopmentLtd by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 散戶投資者對黃山旅遊發展有限公司的重大控制意味着公衆擁有更大的影響管理和治理相關決策的權力
  • 共有25名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲50%
  • 使用分析師預測的數據以及所有權研究,可以更好地評估公司的未來表現

If you want to know who really controls Huangshan Tourism Development Co.,Ltd. (SHSE:600054), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 50% stake, retail investors possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果你想知道誰真正控制了黃山旅遊開發有限公司, Ltd.(上海證券交易所代碼:600054),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。散戶投資者持有 50% 的股份,擁有公司的最大股份。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

As a result, retail investors as a group endured the highest losses last week after market cap fell by CN¥562m.

結果,在市值下降5.62億元人民幣之後,散戶投資者作爲一個整體承受了最大的損失。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Huangshan Tourism DevelopmentLtd.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們有關黃山旅遊開發有限公司的哪些信息。

See our latest analysis for Huangshan Tourism DevelopmentLtd

查看我們對黃山旅遊發展有限公司的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:600054 Ownership Breakdown February 1st 2024
SHSE: 600054 所有權明細 2024 年 2 月 1 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Huangshan Tourism DevelopmentLtd?

關於黃山旅遊發展有限公司,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

We can see that Huangshan Tourism DevelopmentLtd does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Huangshan Tourism DevelopmentLtd's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到,黃山旅遊開發有限公司確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看黃山旅遊發展有限公司的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:600054 Earnings and Revenue Growth February 1st 2024
SHSE: 600054 收益和收入增長 2024 年 2 月 1 日

Huangshan Tourism DevelopmentLtd is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that Huangshan Tourism Group Co., Ltd is the largest shareholder with 41% of shares outstanding. Zhong Ou Fund Management Co., Ltd is the second largest shareholder owning 1.5% of common stock, and The Vanguard Group, Inc. holds about 1.0% of the company stock.

黃山旅遊開發有限公司不歸對沖基金所有。我們的數據顯示,黃山旅遊集團有限公司是最大股東,已發行股份的41%。中歐基金管理有限公司是第二大股東,擁有1.5%的普通股,Vanguard Group, Inc.持有公司約1.0%的股份。

Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

我們的研究表明,前25名股東共同控制的公司股份不到一半,這意味着該公司的股票分佈廣泛,沒有占主導地位的股東。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Huangshan Tourism DevelopmentLtd

黃山旅遊發展有限公司的內幕所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. It is unusual not to have at least some personal holdings by board members, so our data might be flawed. A good next step would be to check how much the CEO is paid.

我們的數據無法證實董事會成員親自持有股份。董事會成員不持有至少部分個人持股的情況很少見,因此我們的數據可能存在缺陷。一個不錯的下一步是檢查首席執行官的薪水是多少。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, collectively holds 50% of Huangshan Tourism DevelopmentLtd shares. This size of ownership gives investors from the general public some collective power. They can and probably do influence decisions on executive compensation, dividend policies and proposed business acquisitions.

公衆主要由個人投資者組成,共持有黃山旅遊發展有限公司50%的股份。這種所有權規模賦予了公衆投資者一定的集體權力。他們可以而且可能確實會影響有關高管薪酬、股息政策和擬議業務收購的決策。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 41%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我們可以看到,私人公司擁有41%的已發行股份。僅從這一事實中很難得出任何結論,因此值得研究一下誰擁有這些私營公司。有時,內部人士或其他關聯方通過獨立的私營公司持有上市公司的股份。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.

我覺得看看究竟是誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們也需要考慮其他信息。

I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我一直喜歡查看收入增長的歷史。您也可以,通過訪問此詳細圖表中的這張免費的歷史收入和收益圖表。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,千萬不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論