What Kind Of Shareholder Owns Most FinCanna Capital Corp. (CNSX:CALI) Stock?
What Kind Of Shareholder Owns Most FinCanna Capital Corp. (CNSX:CALI) Stock?
If you want to know who really controls FinCanna Capital Corp. (CNSX:CALI), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. Generally speaking, as a company grows, institutions will increase their ownership. Conversely, insiders often decrease their ownership over time. Warren Buffett said that he likes 'a business with enduring competitive advantages that is run by able and owner-oriented people'. So it's nice to see some insider ownership, because it may suggest that management is owner-oriented.
如果你想知道誰真正控制着FinCanna Capital Corp.(CNSX：CALI)，那麼你就得看看它的股票登記簿的構成。一般來説，隨着公司的成長，機構會增加他們的持股。相反，隨着時間的推移，內部人士往往會減少他們的持股。沃倫·巴菲特説，他喜歡“由有能力、以所有者為導向的人經營的具有持久競爭優勢的企業”。所以這就是好的看到一些內部人持股，因為這可能表明管理層是以所有者為導向的。
With a market capitalization of CA$12m, FinCanna Capital is a small cap stock, so it might not be well known by many institutional investors. Taking a look at our data on the ownership groups (below), it's seems that institutions don't own shares in the company. Let's delve deeper into each type of owner, to discover more about CALI.
FinCanna Capital的市值為1200萬加元，是一隻小盤股，因此可能不為許多機構投資者所熟知。看看我們關於所有權集團的數據(如下所示)，似乎機構並不擁有該公司的股份。讓我們更深入地研究每種類型的所有者，以發現更多關於Cali的信息。
See our latest analysis for FinCanna Capital
查看我們對FinCanna Capital的最新分析
What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About FinCanna Capital?
關於FinCanna Capital，缺乏機構所有權告訴了我們什麼？
Institutional investors often avoid companies that are too small, too illiquid or too risky for their tastes. But it's unusual to see larger companies without any institutional investors.
機構投資者往往會避開那些規模太小、流動性太差或風險太高的公司，這些公司對他們的口味來説太小了。但在沒有任何機構投資者的情況下，看到較大的公司並不常見。
There are multiple explanations for why institutions don't own a stock. The most common is that the company is too small relative to fund under management, so the institition does not bother to look closely at the company. It is also possible that fund managers don't own the stock because they aren't convinced it will perform well. FinCanna Capital's earnings and revenue track record (below) may not be compelling to institutional investors -- or they simply might not have looked at the business closely.
對於機構為何不持有股票，有多種解釋。最常見的情況是，相對於所管理的資金而言，該公司規模太小，因此該機構沒有費心密切關注該公司。基金經理也有可能不持有這隻股票，因為他們不相信它會表現良好。對於機構投資者來説，FinCanna Capital的盈利和營收記錄(見下文)可能並不令人信服--或者他們可能只是沒有密切關注這項業務。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in FinCanna Capital. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.
對衝基金在FinCanna Capital持有的股份並不多。雖然有一些分析師的報道，但該公司可能沒有得到廣泛的報道。因此，它可以獲得更多的關注，在賽道上。
Insider Ownership Of FinCanna Capital
FinCanna Capital的內部人所有權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
不同國家對內部人的定義可能略有不同，但董事會成員總是算數的。公司管理層管理企業，但首席執行官將向董事會負責，即使他或她是董事會成員。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認為內部人持股是積極的，因為它可以表明董事會與其他股東很好地結盟。然而，在某些情況下，太多的權力集中在這個羣體中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of FinCanna Capital Corp.. Insiders own CA$3.2m worth of shares in the CA$12m company. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.
我們的最新數據顯示，內部人士持有FinCanna Capital Corp.相當比例的股份。在這家市值1200萬加元的公司中，內部人士持有價值320萬加元的股票。這可能表明，創始人仍持有大量股份。您可以單擊此處查看他們是在買入還是在賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public, who are mostly retail investors, collectively hold 74% of FinCanna Capital shares. This size of ownership gives retail investors collective power. They can and probably do influence decisions on executive compensation, dividend policies and proposed business acquisitions.
普通公眾，其中大部分是散户投資者，總共持有FinCanna Capital 74%的股份。這種規模的所有權賦予了散户投資者集體權力。他們能夠而且很可能確實會影響高管薪酬、股息政策和擬議中的企業收購的決策。
Next Steps:
接下來的步驟：
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand FinCanna Capital better, we need to consider many other factors.
擁有一家公司股票的不同集團總是值得考慮的。但為了更好地理解FinCanna Capital，我們需要考慮許多其他因素。
I like to dive deeperinto how a company has performed in the past. You can access thisinteractive graphof past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free .
我喜歡潛入更深的地方瞭解一家公司過去的表現。您可以訪問此互動圖過去的收益、收入和現金流，是免費的。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss thisfreereport on analyst forecasts.
如果你更願意瞭解分析師對未來增長的預測，請不要錯過這一預期免費關於分析師預測的報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注：本文中的數字是使用過去12個月的數據計算的，指的是截至財務報表日期的最後一個月的12個月期間。這可能與全年的年度報告數字不一致。
We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material.
我們的目標是為您帶來由基礎數據驅動的長期重點研究分析。請注意，我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。
If you spot an error that warrants correction, please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned. Thank you for reading.
如果您發現了需要更正的錯誤，請聯繫編輯-Team@implywallst.com。本文由Simply Wall St.撰寫，具有概括性。它不構成買賣任何股票的建議，也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況。Simply Wall St.對上述股票沒有持倉。感謝您的閲讀。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。