share_log

Fortior Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688279) 11% Loss Last Week Hit Both Individual Investors Who Own 43% as Well as Institutions

Fortior Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688279) 11% Loss Last Week Hit Both Individual Investors Who Own 43% as Well as Institutions

Fortior 科技(深圳)有限公司's(SHSE: 688279)上週持有43%的個人投資者和機構均損失了11%
Simply Wall St ·  01/26 06:04

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • The considerable ownership by private companies in Fortior Technology (Shenzhen) indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • 52% of the business is held by the top 2 shareholders
  • Institutions own 26% of Fortior Technology (Shenzhen)
  • 私營公司對Fortior Technology(深圳)的大量所有權表明,它們在管理和業務戰略中集體擁有更大的發言權
  • 52% 的業務由前兩名股東持有
  • 機構擁有 Fortior 科技(深圳)26% 的股份

If you want to know who really controls Fortior Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688279), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 43% to be precise, is private companies. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果你想知道誰真正控制了Fortior科技(深圳)有限公司(SHSE: 688279),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。持有該公司股份最多的集團是私營公司,準確地說約爲43%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

While institutions, who own 26% shares weren't spared from last week's CN¥1.0b market cap drop, private companies as a group suffered the maximum losses

儘管擁有26%股票的機構未能倖免於上週10億元人民幣的市值下跌,但私營公司作爲一個整體遭受的損失最大

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Fortior Technology (Shenzhen), beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究Fortior科技(深圳)的每種類型的所有者。

See our latest analysis for Fortior Technology (Shenzhen)

查看我們對Fortior Technology(深圳)的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:688279 Ownership Breakdown January 25th 2024
SHSE: 688279 所有權明細 2024 年 1 月 25 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Fortior Technology (Shenzhen)?

關於Fortior科技(深圳),機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Fortior Technology (Shenzhen). This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Fortior Technology (Shenzhen)'s historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如您所見,機構投資者持有Fortior Technology(深圳)的大量股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到Fortior Technology(深圳)的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:688279 Earnings and Revenue Growth January 25th 2024
SHSE: 688279 收益和收入增長 2024 年 1 月 25 日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Fortior Technology (Shenzhen). Fortior Technology (HK) Company Limited is currently the company's largest shareholder with 38% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 14% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.0% by the third-largest shareholder. In addition, we found that Bi Lei, the CEO has 1.5% of the shares allocated to their name.

我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對Fortior科技(深圳)進行有意義的投資。Fortior科技(香港)有限公司目前是該公司的最大股東,已發行股份的38%。就背景而言,第二大股東持有約14%的已發行股份,其次是第三大股東持有4.0%的所有權。此外,我們發現首席執行官畢磊擁有1.5%的股份以他們的名義分配。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 2 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.

在進一步挖掘之後,我們發現前兩位股東共同控制了公司一半以上的股份,這意味着他們擁有影響公司決策的巨大權力。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Fortior Technology (Shenzhen)

Fortior 科技(深圳)的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。管理層最終向董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行董事會成員的情況並不少見,特別是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

We can see that insiders own shares in Fortior Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around CN¥387m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們可以看到內部人士擁有Fortior科技(深圳)有限公司的股份。這是一家相當大的公司,因此看到一些可能有意義的調整通常是積極的。在這種情況下,他們擁有價值約3.87億元人民幣的股票(按當前價格計算)。如果您想探討內幕調整問題,可以點擊此處查看內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 12% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Fortior Technology (Shenzhen). While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Fortior Technology(深圳)擁有12%的所有權,主要由個人投資者組成的公衆對Fortior科技(深圳)有一定程度的影響力。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

Private equity firms hold a 14% stake in Fortior Technology (Shenzhen). This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

私募股權公司持有Fortior科技(深圳)14%的股份。這表明他們可以在關鍵政策決策中發揮影響力。一些投資者可能會爲此感到鼓舞,因爲私募股權有時能夠鼓勵制定有助於市場看到公司價值的策略。或者,這些持有人可能會在投資上市後退出投資。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 43%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我們可以看到,私人公司擁有已發行股份的43%。私營公司可能是關聯方。有時,內部人士通過持有私營公司而不是以個人身份對上市公司感興趣。雖然很難得出任何粗略的結論,但值得注意的是,這是一個需要進一步研究的領域。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Fortior Technology (Shenzhen) is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。請注意,Fortior科技(深圳)在我們的投資分析中顯示了1個警告信號,您應該知道...

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論