share_log

Nanjing Chixia Development Co.,Ltd.'s (SHSE:600533) Last Week's 12% Decline Must Have Disappointed Retail Investors Who Have a Significant Stake

Nanjing Chixia Development Co.,Ltd.'s (SHSE:600533) Last Week's 12% Decline Must Have Disappointed Retail Investors Who Have a Significant Stake

南京赤霞開發有限公司,Ltd. 's(上海證券交易所代碼:600533)上週12%的下跌一定讓持有大量股份的散戶投資者失望
Simply Wall St ·  2023/09/17 08:03

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significant control over Nanjing Chixia DevelopmentLtd by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 3 shareholders
  • Institutional ownership in Nanjing Chixia DevelopmentLtd is 11%
  • 散戶投資者對南京赤霞發展有限公司的顯著控制意味著公眾有更大的權力影響與管理和治理相關的決策
  • 51%的業務由前三大股東持有
  • 南京赤霞發展有限公司機構持股11%

If you want to know who really controls Nanjing Chixia Development Co.,Ltd. (SHSE:600533), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 41% stake, retail investors possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想知道誰真正控制了南京赤霞發展有限公司(上交所代碼:600533),那麼你就得看看它的股票登記簿的構成。散戶投資者持有該公司41%的股份,持有該公司最高股份。也就是說,如果股價上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果股價下跌,該集團將損失最大)。

And following last week's 12% decline in share price, retail investors suffered the most losses.

繼上週股價下跌12%之後,散戶投資者遭受的損失最大。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Nanjing Chixia DevelopmentLtd, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下面的圖表開始,更深入地研究南京赤霞發展有限公司的每一種類型的所有者。

View our latest analysis for Nanjing Chixia DevelopmentLtd

查看我們對南京赤霞發展有限公司的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:600533 Ownership Breakdown September 17th 2023
上海證交所:600533所有權明細2023年9月17日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Nanjing Chixia DevelopmentLtd?

關於南京赤霞發展有限公司,機構持股告訴了我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,以基準來衡量自己,因此一旦一隻股票被納入主要指數,它們往往會對這只股票變得更加熱情.我們預計,大多數公司都會有一些機構登記在冊,特別是在它們正在增長的情況下.

We can see that Nanjing Chixia DevelopmentLtd does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Nanjing Chixia DevelopmentLtd's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到,南京赤霞發展有限公司確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司很大一部分股票。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因為機構有時會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人一樣。當多家機構持有一隻股票時,它們總是面臨“擁擠交易”的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速拋售股票。在一家沒有增長曆史的公司,這一風險更高。你可以在下面看到南京赤霞發展有限公司的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多的故事。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:600533 Earnings and Revenue Growth September 17th 2023
上海證交所:600533收益和收入增長2023年9月17日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Nanjing Chixia DevelopmentLtd. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Nanjing Xixia Construct Group Co., Ltd. with 34% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 12% and 4.9% of the stock.

對沖基金在南京赤霞發展有限公司的股份並不多。查看我們的數據可以看到,第一大股東是南京西峽建設集團有限公司,持有34%的流通股。相比之下,第二大股東和第三大股東分別持有約12%和4.9%的股份。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 3 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.

經過進一步挖掘,我們發現,前3名股東合計控制了公司一半以上的股份,這意味著他們擁有相當大的權力來影響公司的決策。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

研究機構持股是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以達到同樣的效果。據我們所知,沒有分析師對該公司的報道,所以它很可能在雷達下飛行。

Insider Ownership Of Nanjing Chixia DevelopmentLtd

南京赤霞發展有限公司的內部人所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人的定義可能是主觀的,而且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同.我們的數據反映了個別內部人士,至少捕捉到了董事會成員.公司管理層對董事會負責,董事會應代表股東的利益.值得注意的是,有時最高層管理人員本身也是董事會成員.

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認為內部人持股是積極的,因為它可以表明董事會與其他股東很好地結盟.然而,在某些情況下,太多的權力集中在這個群體中.

Our information suggests that Nanjing Chixia Development Co.,Ltd. insiders own under 1% of the company. But they may have an indirect interest through a corporate structure that we haven't picked up on. It appears that the board holds about CN¥13m worth of stock. This compares to a market capitalization of CN¥3.3b. We generally like to see a board more invested. However it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們的資訊顯示,南京赤霞發展有限公司內部人士持有該公司不到1%的股份。但他們可能通過一種我們沒有注意到的公司結構擁有間接利益。該董事會似乎持有價值約1300萬元人民幣的股票。相比之下,該公司的市值為人民幣33億元。我們通常希望看到董事會投入更多資金。然而,或許有必要檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 41% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Nanjing Chixia DevelopmentLtd. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

持有41%股權的普通公眾,主要由個人投資者組成,對南京赤霞發展有限公司有一定程度的影響力。這種規模的所有權雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私營公司所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 35%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我們的數據顯示,私營公司持有該公司35%的股份。私營公司可能是關聯方。有時,內部人士通過持有一傢俬人公司來對上市公司感興趣,而不是以個人身分。雖然很難得出任何大致的中風結論,但值得注意的是,這是一個值得進一步研究的領域。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

It appears to us that public companies own 12% of Nanjing Chixia DevelopmentLtd. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.

在我們看來,上市公司擁有南京赤霞發展有限公司12%的股份。這可能是一種戰略利益,兩家公司可能有相關的商業利益。這可能是因為它們已經解體。這一持股可能值得進一步調查。

Next Steps:

接下來的步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Nanjing Chixia DevelopmentLtd has 6 warning signs (and 3 which shouldn't be ignored) we think you should know about.

我發現看看到底是誰擁有一家公司是非常有趣的。但為了真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他資訊。以風險為例-南京赤霞發展有限公司6個警示標誌(3)我們認為你應該知道這一點。

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

如果你更願意看看另一家公司--一家財務狀況可能更好的公司--那麼不要錯過這一點免費令人感興趣的公司名單,有強勁的財務數據支持。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數位是使用過去12個月的數據計算的,指的是截至財務報表日期的最後一個月的12個月期間.這可能與全年的年度報告數位不一致.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎? 保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫.或者,也可以給編輯組發電子郵件,地址是暗示Wallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰寫,具有概括性.我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議.它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況.我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析.請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內.Simply Wall St.對上述任何一隻股票都沒有持倉.

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論