share_log

Haw Par Corporation Limited's (SGX:H02) Market Cap Touched S$2.1b Last Week, Benefiting Both Private Companies Who Own 36% as Well as Institutions

Haw Par Corporation Limited's (SGX:H02) Market Cap Touched S$2.1b Last Week, Benefiting Both Private Companies Who Own 36% as Well as Institutions

Haw Par Corporation Limited(SGX: H02)的市值上周触及21亿新元,既使拥有 36% 的私营公司受益,也使机构受益
Simply Wall St ·  2023/06/17 07:16

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Significant control over Haw Par by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • A total of 4 investors have a majority stake in the company with 54% ownership
  • 34% of Haw Par is held by Institutions
  • 私营公司对Haw Par的重大控制意味着公众拥有更大的权力来影响管理和治理相关决策
  • 共有4位投资者持有该公司的多数股权,所有权为54%
  • Haw Par 的 34% 由机构持有

A look at the shareholders of Haw Par Corporation Limited (SGX:H02) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are private companies with 36% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看看Haw Par Corporation Limited(SGX: H02)的股东就能知道哪个集团最强大。而占据最大份额的集团是拥有36%所有权的私营公司。换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最大收益(或损失最大)。

While private companies were the group that reaped the most benefits after last week's 3.8% price gain, institutions also received a 34% cut.

尽管继上周股价上涨3.8%之后,私营公司是获得最大收益的集团,但机构也获得了34%的削减。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Haw Par.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于Haw Par的哪些信息。

Check out our latest analysis for Haw Par

查看我们对 Haw Par 的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
SGX:H02 Ownership Breakdown June 16th 2023
SGX: H02 所有权明细 2023 年 6 月 16 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Haw Par?

关于Haw Par,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构在向自己的投资者报告时通常会根据基准来衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会对股票更加热情。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在册,尤其是在它们正在成长的情况下。

Haw Par already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Haw Par, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

Haw Par 在股票登记处已经有机构了。事实上,他们拥有该公司可观的股份。这可以表明该公司在投资界具有一定程度的信誉。但是,最好谨慎行事,不要依赖机构投资者提供的假定验证。他们也是,有时候会弄错。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售一只股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得一看Haw Par过去的收益轨迹(下图)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SGX:H02 Earnings and Revenue Growth June 16th 2023
SGX: H02 收益和收入增长 2023 年 6 月 16 日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Haw Par. The company's largest shareholder is Wee Investments Pte Ltd, with ownership of 28%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 11% and 9.8% of the stock.

我们注意到,对冲基金对Haw Par没有有意义的投资。该公司的最大股东是Wee Investments Pte Ltd,所有权为28%。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约11%和9.8%的股份。

Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 54% of the company is controlled by the top 4 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.

我们的研究还揭示了这样一个事实,即公司约有54%的股份由前四名股东控制,这表明这些所有者对业务具有重大影响。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向哪个方向吹来也是有意义的。我们的信息表明,分析师对该股没有任何报道,因此可能鲜为人知。

Insider Ownership Of Haw Par

Haw Par 的内部所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

不同国家对内部人士的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员始终算在内。管理层最终对董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行委员会成员的情况并不少见,尤其是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。

We can see that insiders own shares in Haw Par Corporation Limited. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth S$33m. Most would see this as a real positive. It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我们可以看到,内部人士拥有Haw Par Corporation Limited的股份。内部人士拥有价值3300万新元的有意义的股份。大多数人会认为这是真正的积极因素。很高兴看到内部人士的这种投资水平。你可以在这里查看那些内部人士最近是否在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 26% stake in Haw Par. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公众通常是个人投资者,持有Haw Par26%的股份。虽然这个群体不一定能做主,但它肯定会对公司的运作方式产生真正的影响。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有权

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 36%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我们的数据表明,私人公司持有该公司36%的股份。可能值得对此进行更深入的研究。如果关联方,例如内部人士,对其中一家私营公司感兴趣,则应在年度报告中披露。私营公司也可能对公司有战略利益。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Haw Par is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those is potentially serious...

虽然值得考虑拥有公司的不同群体,但还有其他因素更为重要。请注意 Haw Par 正在露面 我们的投资分析中有两个警告信号 ,其中一个可能很严重...

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

如果你想看看另一家公司 —— 一家财务状况可能优越的公司 —— 那千万不要错过这个 免费的 有趣的公司名单,以强劲的财务数据为后盾。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?担心内容吗? 取得联系 直接和我们在一起。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St 的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。 我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。 它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本面数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街在上述任何股票中都没有头寸。

译文内容由第三方软件翻译。


以上内容仅用作资讯或教育之目的,不构成与富途相关的任何投资建议。富途竭力但不能保证上述全部内容的真实性、准确性和原创性。
    抢沙发