share_log

Haw Par Corporation Limited's (SGX:H02) Market Cap Touched S$2.1b Last Week, Benefiting Both Private Companies Who Own 36% as Well as Institutions

Haw Par Corporation Limited's (SGX:H02) Market Cap Touched S$2.1b Last Week, Benefiting Both Private Companies Who Own 36% as Well as Institutions

Haw Par Corporation Limited(SGX: H02)的市值上週觸及21億新元,既使擁有 36% 的私營公司受益,也使機構受益
Simply Wall St ·  2023/06/17 07:16

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significant control over Haw Par by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • A total of 4 investors have a majority stake in the company with 54% ownership
  • 34% of Haw Par is held by Institutions
  • 私營公司對Haw Par的重大控制意味着公衆擁有更大的權力來影響管理和治理相關決策
  • 共有4位投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲54%
  • Haw Par 的 34% 由機構持有

A look at the shareholders of Haw Par Corporation Limited (SGX:H02) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are private companies with 36% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看看Haw Par Corporation Limited(SGX: H02)的股東就能知道哪個集團最強大。而佔據最大份額的集團是擁有36%所有權的私營公司。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最大收益(或損失最大)。

While private companies were the group that reaped the most benefits after last week's 3.8% price gain, institutions also received a 34% cut.

儘管繼上週股價上漲3.8%之後,私營公司是獲得最大收益的集團,但機構也獲得了34%的削減。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Haw Par.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於Haw Par的哪些信息。

Check out our latest analysis for Haw Par

查看我們對 Haw Par 的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
SGX:H02 Ownership Breakdown June 16th 2023
SGX: H02 所有權明細 2023 年 6 月 16 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Haw Par?

關於Haw Par,機構所有權告訴我們甚麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

Haw Par already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Haw Par, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

Haw Par 在股票登記處已經有機構了。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這可以表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者提供的假定驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售一隻股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得一看Haw Par過去的收益軌跡(下圖)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SGX:H02 Earnings and Revenue Growth June 16th 2023
SGX: H02 收益和收入增長 2023 年 6 月 16 日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Haw Par. The company's largest shareholder is Wee Investments Pte Ltd, with ownership of 28%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 11% and 9.8% of the stock.

我們注意到,對沖基金對Haw Par沒有有意義的投資。該公司的最大股東是Wee Investments Pte Ltd,所有權爲28%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約11%和9.8%的股份。

Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 54% of the company is controlled by the top 4 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.

我們的研究還揭示了這樣一個事實,即公司約有54%的股份由前四名股東控制,這表明這些所有者對業務具有重大影響。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以瞭解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。我們的信息表明,分析師對該股沒有任何報道,因此可能鮮爲人知。

Insider Ownership Of Haw Par

Haw Par 的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終算在內。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

We can see that insiders own shares in Haw Par Corporation Limited. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth S$33m. Most would see this as a real positive. It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們可以看到,內部人士擁有Haw Par Corporation Limited的股份。內部人士擁有價值3300萬新元的有意義的股份。大多數人會認爲這是真正的積極因素。很高興看到內部人士的這種投資水平。你可以在這裏查看那些內部人士最近是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 26% stake in Haw Par. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有Haw Par26%的股份。雖然這個羣體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 36%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我們的數據表明,私人公司持有該公司36%的股份。可能值得對此進行更深入的研究。如果關聯方,例如內部人士,對其中一傢俬營公司感興趣,則應在年度報告中披露。私營公司也可能對公司有戰略利益。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Haw Par is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those is potentially serious...

雖然值得考慮擁有公司的不同羣體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。請注意 Haw Par 正在露面 我們的投資分析中有兩個警告信號 ,其中一個可能很嚴重...

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

如果你想看看另一家公司 —— 一家財務狀況可能優越的公司 —— 那千萬不要錯過這個 免費的 有趣的公司名單,以強勁的財務數據爲後盾。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎? 取得聯繫 直接和我們在一起。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。 我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。 它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街在上述任何股票中都沒有頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論