share_log

Could The Sealand Securities Co., Ltd. (SZSE:000750) Ownership Structure Tell Us Something Useful?

Could The Sealand Securities Co., Ltd. (SZSE:000750) Ownership Structure Tell Us Something Useful?

海蘭證券股份有限公司(SZSE:000750)的股權結構能告訴我們一些有用的東西嗎?
Simply Wall St ·  2022/05/07 08:53

The big shareholder groups in Sealand Securities Co., Ltd. (SZSE:000750) have power over the company. Insiders often own a large chunk of younger, smaller, companies while huge companies tend to have institutions as shareholders. We also tend to see lower insider ownership in companies that were previously publicly owned.

海蘭證券股份有限公司(SZSE:000750)的大股東集團對公司擁有控制權。內部人士通常持有大量較年輕、規模較小的公司,而大公司往往有機構作為股東。我們還傾向於看到,以前為公眾所有的公司的內部人持股比例較低。

Sealand Securities isn't enormous, but it's not particularly small either. It has a market capitalization of CN¥18b, which means it would generally expect to see some institutions on the share registry. Our analysis of the ownership of the company, below, shows that institutional investors have bought into the company. Let's delve deeper into each type of owner, to discover more about Sealand Securities.

Sealand Securities並不是很大,但也不是特別小。它的市值為180億元人民幣,這意味着它通常預計會有一些機構出現在股票登記簿上。我們對該公司所有權的分析顯示,機構投資者買入了該公司的股票。讓我們更深入地研究每種類型的所有者,以瞭解更多關於Sealand Securities的信息。

See our latest analysis for Sealand Securities

查看我們對Sealand Securities的最新分析

SZSE:000750 Ownership Breakdown May 7th 2022
深交所:000750所有權明細2022年5月7日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Sealand Securities?

關於Sealand Securities,機構所有權告訴了我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與經常跟蹤的指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常確實會考慮收購被納入相關基準指數的較大公司。

Sealand Securities already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Sealand Securities' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

Sealand Securities已經在股票登記處擁有機構。事實上,他們在該公司擁有可觀的股份。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因為機構有時會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人一樣。當多家機構持有一隻股票時,它們總是面臨“擁擠交易”的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速拋售股票。在一家沒有增長曆史的公司,這一風險更高。你可以在下面看到Sealand Securities的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事中總是有更多的東西。

SZSE:000750 Earnings and Revenue Growth May 7th 2022
深交所:2022年5月7日收益和收入增長000750

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Sealand Securities. Guangxi Investment Group Co., Ltd. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 24% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 5.1% and 3.8%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

對衝基金在Sealand Securities持有的股份並不多。廣西投資集團有限公司目前是該公司的第一大股東,持有24%的流通股。與此同時,第二大和第三大股東分別持有5.1%和3.8%的流通股。

Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

我們的研究表明,前25名股東總共控制着公司不到一半的股份,這意味着公司的股票被廣泛傳播,沒有佔主導地位的股東。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.

雖然研究一家公司的機構持股可以增加你的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地瞭解一隻股票的預期表現也是一個很好的做法。目前,我們沒有注意到分析師對該股的報道,因此該公司不太可能被廣泛持有。

Insider Ownership Of Sealand Securities

Sealand Securities的內部人所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

儘管對內部人的準確定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認為董事會成員是內部人。公司管理層管理企業,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

內部人持股是積極的,當它標誌着領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時。然而,高內部人持股也可以給公司內部的一個小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. Given we are not picking up on insider ownership, we may have missing data. Therefore, it would be interesting to assess the CEO compensation and tenure, here.

我們的數據不能證實董事會成員是個人持股。鑑於我們沒有發現內部人持股的情況,我們可能會遺漏數據。因此,在這裏評估CEO的薪酬和任期將是一件有趣的事情。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a substantial 51% stake in Sealand Securities, suggesting it is a fairly popular stock. With this amount of ownership, retail investors can collectively play a role in decisions that affect shareholder returns, such as dividend policies and the appointment of directors. They can also exercise the power to vote on acquisitions or mergers that may not improve profitability.

公眾通常是個人投資者,他們持有Sealand Securities相當大的51%的股份,這表明它是一隻相當受歡迎的股票。有了這樣的持股量,散户投資者就可以集體在影響股東回報的決策中發揮作用,比如股息政策和董事任命。他們還可以對可能不會提高盈利能力的收購或合併行使投票權。

Private Company Ownership

私營公司所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 37%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我們可以看到,私營公司擁有37%的已發行股份。私營公司可能是關聯方。有時,內部人士通過持有一傢俬人公司來對上市公司感興趣,而不是以個人身份。雖然很難得出任何大致的中風結論,但值得注意的是,這是一個值得進一步研究的領域。

Next Steps:

接下來的步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for Sealand Securities that you should be aware of before investing here.

我發現看看到底是誰擁有一家公司是非常有趣的。但為了真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們發現了Sealand Securities的三個警告信號,在這裏投資之前應該注意。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.

當然了這可能不是最值得購買的股票。。所以讓我們來看看這個免費感興趣的公司的免費列表。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數字是使用過去12個月的數據計算的,指的是截至財務報表日期的最後一個月的12個月期間。這可能與全年的年度報告數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫。或者,也可以給編輯組發電子郵件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰寫,具有概括性。我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議。它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況。我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。Simply Wall St.對上述任何一隻股票都沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論