share_log

What Kind Of Investors Own Most Of Avanti Acquisition Corp. (NYSE:AVAN)?

What Kind Of Investors Own Most Of Avanti Acquisition Corp. (NYSE:AVAN)?

什么样的投资者拥有Avanti收购公司(纽约证券交易所代码:AVAN)的大部分股份?
Simply Wall St. ·  2021/09/30 18:36

A look at the shareholders of Avanti Acquisition Corp. (NYSE:AVAN) can tell us which group is most powerful. Generally speaking, as a company grows, institutions will increase their ownership. Conversely, insiders often decrease their ownership over time. Companies that have been privatized tend to have low insider ownership.

看一看的股东Avanti收购公司。(纽约证券交易所代码:AVEN)可以告诉我们哪个集团最强大。一般来说,随着公司的成长,机构会增加他们的持股。相反,随着时间的推移,内部人士往往会减少他们的持股。已经私有化的公司往往拥有较低的内部人持股。

With a market capitalization of US$733m, Avanti Acquisition is a small cap stock, so it might not be well known by many institutional investors. Taking a look at our data on the ownership groups (below), it seems that institutional investors have bought into the company. Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Avanti Acquisition.

Avanti收购的市值为7.33亿美元,是一只小盘股,因此可能不为许多机构投资者所熟知。看看我们关于所有权集团的数据(如下所示),似乎是机构投资者买入了该公司的股票。让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于Avanti收购的什么。

View our latest analysis for Avanti AcquisitionNYSE:AVAN Ownership Breakdown September 30th 2021What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Avanti Acquisition?

查看我们对Avanti收购的最新分析纽约证券交易所:Avan所有权细分2021年9月30日关于Avanti收购,机构所有权告诉了我们什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与经常跟踪的指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常确实会考虑收购被纳入相关基准指数的较大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Avanti Acquisition. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Avanti Acquisition's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.NYSE:AVAN Earnings and Revenue Growth September 30th 2021

如你所见,机构投资者在Avanti收购中拥有相当数量的股份。这可以表明该公司在投资界具有一定的公信力。然而,最好警惕依赖机构投资者带来的所谓验证。他们也一样,有时也会犯错。当多家机构持有一只股票时,它们总是面临“拥挤交易”的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速抛售股票。在一家没有增长历史的公司,这一风险更高。你可以在下面看到Avanti收购的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事总是有更多的内容。纽约证券交易所:Avanti收益和收入增长2021年9月30日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. It looks like hedge funds own 15% of Avanti Acquisition shares. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. The company's largest shareholder is NNS Group, with ownership of 20%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 9.6% and 5.3% of the stock.

由于机构投资者拥有一半以上的已发行股票,董事会可能不得不关注他们的偏好。看起来对冲基金拥有15%的Avanti收购股份。这很有趣,因为对冲基金可以相当活跃和积极。许多人在寻找将推动股价走高的中期催化剂。该公司最大股东为NNS集团,持股20%。相比之下,第二大和第三大股东分别持有约9.6%和5.3%的股份。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 9 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

进一步调查后,我们发现该公司超过一半的股份由前9名股东持有,这表明较大股东的利益在一定程度上被较小股东所平衡。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. As far I can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.Insider Ownership Of Avanti Acquisition

虽然研究一家公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向也是有意义的。据我所知,没有分析师对该公司的报道,因此它很可能是在低调行事。Avanti收购的内部人所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同国家对内部人的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是算数的。公司管理层对董事会负责,董事会应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时最高层管理人员本身也是董事会成员。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

内部人持股是积极的,当它标志着领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时。然而,高内部人持股也可以给公司内部的一个小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our information suggests that Avanti Acquisition Corp. insiders own under 1% of the company. It appears that the board holds about US$1.7m worth of stock. This compares to a market capitalization of US$733m. Many investors in smaller companies prefer to see the board more heavily invested. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.General Public Ownership

我们的信息显示,Avanti收购公司的内部人士持有该公司不到1%的股份。董事会似乎持有价值约170万美元的股票。相比之下,该公司的市值为7.33亿美元。许多小公司的投资者更希望看到董事会加大投资。你可以点击这里,看看这些内部人士是一直在买入还是卖出。一般公有制

With a 22% ownership, the general public have some degree of sway over Avanti Acquisition. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.Next Steps:

拥有22%的股权,普通公众对Avanti的收购有一定程度的影响力。这种规模的所有权虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。接下来的步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted2 warning signs for Avanti Acquisition(of which 1 doesn't sit too well with us!) you should know about.

我发现看看到底是谁拥有一家公司是非常有趣的。但为了真正获得洞察力,我们还需要考虑其他信息。比如风险。每家公司都有它们,我们已经发现2个收购Avanti的警告信号(其中1个与我们坐在一起不太好!)你应该知道。

Of coursethis may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see ourfreecollection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.

当然了这可能不是最值得购买的股票。。因此,您可能希望看到我们的免费一组有趣的潜在客户,拥有有利的财务状况。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数字是使用过去12个月的数据计算的,指的是截至财务报表日期的最后一个月的12个月期间。这可能与全年的年度报告数字不一致。

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature.We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice.It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

本文由Simply Wall St.撰写,具有概括性。我们仅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并不打算作为财务建议。它不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也没有考虑你的目标或你的财务状况。我们的目标是为您带来由基本面数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会将最新的对价格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考虑在内。Simply Wall St.对上述任何一只股票都没有持仓。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content?Get in touchwith us directly.Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

对这篇文章有什么反馈吗?担心内容吗?保持联系直接与我们联系。或者,也可以给编辑组发电子邮件,地址是implywallst.com。

译文内容由第三方软件翻译。


以上内容仅用作资讯或教育之目的,不构成与富途相关的任何投资建议。富途竭力但不能保证上述全部内容的真实性、准确性和原创性。
    抢沙发