On June 28 local time, the US Supreme Court, by a vote of 6 to 3, rejected a legal precedent in the 1984 Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council case. The precedent stipulated that judges should defer to federal institutions' legal interpretations when regulations are ambiguous. Initially, this was seen as reducing the regulatory burden on businesses, but in reality, this ruling means that both the Democratic and Republican parties can use it to give institutions flexibility in implementing new regulations on various issues.
美最高法院驳回一项法律先例 打击联邦机构权力
The US Supreme Court rejected a legal precedent to curb federal institutional power.
The translation is provided by third-party software.
The above content is for informational or educational purposes only and does not constitute any investment advice related to Futu. Although we strive to ensure the truthfulness, accuracy, and originality of all such content, we cannot guarantee it.